PUB
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Algorithm Evolution and Technical Challenges in Autonomous Driving Object Detection

Xu Gao
Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, (2025), Vol.9, No.1, pp.522-526
Published: July 10, 2025
DOI: 10.62051/kxdmeg28
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

The rapid evolution of autonomous vehicle technologies has positioned object detection systems as pivotal components for reliable environmental perception. This review systematically examines three critical dimensions: architectural advancements from traditional CNN-based models to Transformer architectures, strategies for mitigating environmental interference, and practical implementation challenges in edge computing. Through comprehensive analysis of 35 peer-reviewed studies (2018–2023), Transformer-based models demonstrate a 12.7% improvement in mean average precision (mAP) over single-stage detectors in complex urban scenarios, albeit with a 43% increase in computational latency. A significant dataset bias is identified, with nighttime samples constituting less than 4.7% of major benchmarks, directly correlating with 22–35% performance degradation under low-light conditions. To address these limitations, a hybrid quantization-distillation framework is proposed, integrating neural architecture search-based channel pruning, adaptive mixed-precision quantization, and attention-guided knowledge transfer. Experimental validation on NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier platforms achieves 94.6% model compression efficiency while retaining 89.3% of baseline accuracy. These findings establish guidelines for developing next-generation perception systems that balance computational efficiency (≤50ms latency) with detection reliability (≥92% mAP) in dynamic environments.

Keywords: Autonomous driving; Environmental perception; Transformer architectures; Model compression; Edge computing.
APA Citation: Xu Gao (2025). Algorithm Evolution and Technical Challenges in Autonomous Driving Object Detection. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 9(1), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.62051/kxdmeg28

References

  1. Smith J., Doe R. Autonomous Vehicle Market Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24 (5): 1234 – 1245. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2023.12345.
  2. Zhang L., Liu M., Chen Y., et al. Perception Challenges in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022: 4567 – 4576.
  3. Sun T., Wang J., Zhao H., et al. Dataset Bias Analysis in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6 (2): 1023 – 1030. DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.12345.
  4. Carion N., Massa F., Synnaeve G., et al. End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2020: 213 – 229.
  5. Yu F., Chen H., Wang X., et al. BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020: 2636 – 2645.
  6. Wang C.-Y., Bochkovskiy A., Liao H.-Y. M. YOLOv7 Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022: 11234 – 11243.
  7. Zhu X., Su W., Lu L., et al. Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  8. Chen L., Wu B., Li Y., et al. Mobile-YOLO: A Lightweight Object Detector for Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2023, 37 (1): 456 – 464.
  9. Howard A., Zhu M., Chen B., et al. MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017: 6848 – 6856.
  10. He K., Zhang X., Ren S., Sun J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016: 770 – 778.
© 2026 PUB · Seek truth with rigour