PUB
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Judicial Identification of Labour Relationships in Platform Work in the Digital Economy

Hanyu Qiao
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, (2026), Vol.10, No.10, pp.13-21
Published: October 28, 2026
DOI: 10.62051/ijsspa.v10n10.03
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

The development of the digital economy has reshaped the way labour is organised. Platform-mediated work - food delivery, ride-hailing, live streaming and on-demand freight - has expanded rapidly. Platform enterprises typically present themselves as providers of technical services, information matching or cooperative contracting, yet in practice they shape the labour process through algorithmic dispatching, service ratings, pricing rules, reward and penalty mechanisms and account control. The central judicial question that arises is whether a labour relationship exists between the worker and the platform or its partner enterprise. The traditional identification of labour relationships rests on personal, economic and organisational subordination, but platform work combines formal flexibility with substantive control, which gives rise to inconsistent standards across courts. Taking the notion of ‘dominant labour management’ as its point of departure, this article examines the doctrinal basis, the practical difficulties and the adjudicative approach to identifying labour relationships in platform work. It argues that the digital economy has not altered the essential structure of domination and subordination within the labour relationship; it has merely transformed labour management from direct commands into rule-based, algorithmic and evaluative forms of control. Judicial practice should adhere to a fact-first principle and assess, in combination, the contractual label, the work rules, algorithmic dispatching, the source of remuneration, business integration, the allocation of risk and the parties’ evidential capacity, so as to balance the protection of workers’ rights against the vitality of the platform economy.

Keywords: Digital Economy, Platform Work, Labour Relationship, Dominant Labour Management, Algorithmic Management
APA Citation: Hanyu Qiao (2026). Judicial Identification of Labour Relationships in Platform Work in the Digital Economy. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 10(10), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n10.03

References

  1. Chen, Z. (2025). The multidimensional dilemma and institutional reconstruction of the judicial identification of labour relationships for online delivery riders: Based on platform work practice in China. Hebei Falü Zhiye Jiaoyu [Hebei Legal Vocational Education], (12). [in Chinese]
  2. Supreme People’s Court. (2025, April 30). Typical cases on safeguarding the rights and interests of workers in new forms of employment.
  3. Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (1994/2018). Labour Law of the People’s Republic of China.
  4. Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2007/2012). Labour Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China.
  5. Li, G. (2026, February). Research on the identification of labour relationships in internet platform work. Fazhi Bolan [Law Review], (4). [in Chinese]
  6. Supreme People’s Court, & Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security. (2023, May). Typical labour dispute cases concerning new forms of employment.
  7. Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security & seven other departments. (2021). Guiding opinions on safeguarding the labour protection rights and interests of workers in new forms of employment (MOHRSS Document No. 56 [2021]).
  8. Bi, J. (2024). A brief discussion of the dilemma of identifying labour relationships in internet platform work models. Jiuye yu Baozhang [Employment and Security], (10). [in Chinese]
  9. Cheng, Z. (2025). An analysis of the identification of labour relationships in organisational internet platform work. Zhigong Falü Tiandi [Workers’ Legal World]. [in Chinese]
  10. Dong, Z. (2025). The identification of labour relationships in platform work and suggestions for improvement. Zhigong Falü Tiandi [Workers’ Legal World]. [in Chinese]
  11. Luo, H. (2024). The dilemma and the way out of identifying labour relationships in online platform work under new forms of employment. Fazhi Bolan [Law Review]. [in Chinese]
  12. Chai, H., & Sun, Y. (2025). Problems in identifying labour relationships in platform work and improved approaches. Zhigong Falü Tiandi [Workers’ Legal World]. [in Chinese]
  13. Wei, Y. (2022). Protection of the rights and interests of workers in new forms of employment under the platform economy. Shangye Jingji [Business Economy], (3). [in Chinese]
  14. Wang, Q. (2022). Reflections on the protection of workers in new forms of business in the digital-intelligent era. Qinghai Shehui Kexue [Qinghai Social Sciences], (6). [in Chinese]
  15. Liu, Z. (2023). Research on the protection of the rights and interests of workers in incomplete labour relationships under new forms of employment. Shehui Fuli [Social Welfare], (12). [in Chinese]
  16. Yu, L., & Yuan, B. (2024, May). An analysis of the protection mechanism for workers in new forms of employment from the perspective of comparative analysis. Fazhi Bolan [Law Review]. [in Chinese]
  17. Xu, J. (2022). Difficulties and suggestions in protecting the rights and interests of workers in new forms of employment. Sichuan Laodong Baozhang [Sichuan Labour and Social Security], (4), 36–37. [in Chinese]
© 2026 PUB · Seek truth with rigour