Modelling the consequences of a liquid hydrogen leak using ALOHA software:Case Study of a Liquid Hydrogen (UN1966) Tanker Accident

Yanhuo Luo; Jiayi Luo

doi:10.62051/ijnres.v3n1.16

Modelling the consequences of a liquid hydrogen leak using ALOHA software:Case Study of a Liquid Hydrogen (UN1966) Tanker Accident

Yanhuo Luo, Jiayi Luo

International Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, (2024), Vol.3, No.1, pp.113-128

Published: July 30, 2024

DOI: 10.62051/ijnres.v3n1.16

PDF: Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of a liquid hydrogen (UN1966) tanker accident that occurred on October 23, 2017, in Niagara Falls, NY, USA. Utilizing Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) methodologies, specifically the ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) modeling tool, the study evaluates the toxic and flammable threat zones created by the hydrogen vapor cloud resulting from the tanker collision. The incident's emergency response and its effectiveness in mitigating potential disasters were examined. Key lessons and preventive strategies were identified, emphasizing the importance of robust risk assessment, continuous monitoring, public awareness, and effective emergency response planning. The findings underscore the critical role of advanced QRA techniques in enhancing industrial safety and managing hazardous chemical incidents.

Keywords: Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA), ALOHA, Liquid Hydrogen, Chemical Accident, Hazardous Materials, Emergency Response, Toxic Threat Zones, Flammable Threat Zones, Risk Mitigation, Industrial Safety.

APA Citation: Yanhuo Luo, Jiayi Luo (2024). Modelling the consequences of a liquid hydrogen leak using ALOHA software:Case Study of a Liquid Hydrogen (UN1966) Tanker Accident. International Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, 3(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijnres.v3n1.16

References

Aven, T., & Vinnem, J. E. (2007). Risk management: With applications from the offshore petroleum industry. Springer Science & Business Media.
Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods. Cambridge University Press.
Covello, V. T., & Mumpower, J. (1985). Risk analysis and risk management: An historical perspective. Risk Analysis, 5(2), 103-120.
CSB. (2010). Final Investigation Report: Kleen Energy Natural Gas Explosion. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. Retrieved from https://www.csb.gov
CSB. (2019). Final Investigation Report: Hydrogen Explosion at Air Products and Chemicals Facility. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. Retrieved from https://www.csb.gov
Henley, E. J., & Kumamoto, H. (1981). Reliability engineering and risk assessment. Prentice-Hall.
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11-27.
Lees, F. P. (1996). Loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Mannan, M. S. (Ed.). (2012). Lees' loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control (Vol. 1). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Reniers, G., & Cozzani, V. (2013). Domino effects in the process industries: Modelling, prevention and managing. Newnes.