PUB
  • Home
  • Sources
  • Search
  • About

Digital Transformation of Cross-Border Logistics in Landlocked Countries: Drivers, Barriers, and Pathways

Lian Dai, Delgernasan Mishig, Munkhbayar Bat-Erdene
Academic Journal of Management Science and Engineering, (2026), Vol.1, No.7, pp.107-119
Published: November 1, 2026
DOI: 10.62051/ajmse.v1n7.11
PDF: Download Full Text PDF
Abstract

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) face structural disadvantages in cross-border logistics, with trade costs up to 74% higher than the global average and border crossing times twice as long as those of coastal countries. Digital transformation offers a pathway to overcome these geographic constraints, yet the drivers, barriers, and implementation pathways specific to LLDC contexts remain poorly understood. This study employs a mixed-methods research design combining quantitative survey data (n=127) from Mongolian logistics stakeholders with qualitative semi-structured interviews (n=18) and document analysis to investigate the digital transformation of cross-border logistics in Mongolia—a paradigmatic LLDC situated between China and Russia. Quantitative findings identify trade facilitation pressure (mean=4.21/5), cost reduction potential (mean=3.94), and regional integration commitments (mean=3.76) as the strongest drivers, while infrastructure limitations (mean=4.38), regulatory fragmentation (mean=4.02), and skills shortages (mean=3.87) emerge as dominant barriers. Qualitative analysis reveals four implementation pathways: incremental customs automation, corridor-level digital integration, platform-based logistics ecosystem development, and cross-border e-commerce enablement. A multi-stage pathway model is proposed, linking short-term customs digitalization to long-term multimodal digital corridor integration. The study contributes a context-sensitive framework for understanding digital transformation in LLDC logistics and provides actionable insights for policymakers in Mongolia and comparable landlocked economies.

Keywords: Digital Transformation, Cross-border Logistics, Landlocked Developing Countries, Mongolia, Mixed-Methods, Trade Facilitation
APA Citation: Lian Dai, Delgernasan Mishig, Munkhbayar Bat-Erdene (2026). Digital Transformation of Cross-Border Logistics in Landlocked Countries: Drivers, Barriers, and Pathways. Academic Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 1(7), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.62051/ajmse.v1n7.11

References

  1. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
  2. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
  3. Shen, L., Huang, Y., Teo, C. E., Ooi, K. O., Tian, Z., & Wan, B. Y. (2025). A data-informed evaluation framework for improving logistics mode selection in cross-border e-commerce. Journal of Shipping and Trade.
  4. Huang, K., Deng, D., Mo, Q., Chen, Q., Wang, S., Wang, F., Ban, L., & Chen, Y. (2025). Evaluation system for international logistics mode selection of leading enterprises in Guangxi based on AHP-FCE. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Algorithm-Driven Logistics Optimization. Atlantis Press.
  5. (2025). Research on logistics model selection for textile and apparel B2C cross-border e-commerce. Western Leather, (7), 61–64, 93.
  6. Xu, J. (2025). Research on the AHP-TOPSIS logistics channel model under the cross-border e-commerce comprehensive pilot zone policy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences.
  7. Wang, X., Xie, J., & Fan, Z. P. (2021). B2C cross-border e-commerce logistics mode selection considering product returns. International Journal of Production Research, 59(13), 3841–3860. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1775894.
  8. Zha, X., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Dan, B. (2022). Bonded-warehouse or direct-mail? Logistics mode choice in a cross-border e-commerce supply chain with platform information sharing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 54, 101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101181.
  9. Giuffrida, M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., & Tumino, A. (2019). Cross-border B2C e-commerce to China: An evaluation of different logistics solutions under uncertainty. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(3), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0044.
  10. Lin, Q., Zhang, K., Huang, D., et al. (2024). Evaluating the impact of Trans-Asian railway on logistics mode selection between Thailand and China: An AHP-TOPSIS approach. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 98, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.047.
  11. Yüksel, F. Ş., Zengin, Ş., & Antmen, Z. F. (2026). An integrated fuzzy MCDM framework for evaluating sustainable logistics performance in the green supply chain. Sustainability, 18(7), 3645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073645.
  12. Luo, S. Q. (2020). Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of logistics performance for agricultural products distribution centers. IEEE Xplore.
© 2026 PUB · Seek truth with rigour